It’s time for the new government to redirect country’s foreign policy and strengthen institutions to enhance international relations
By Dr. Som P. Pudasaini
A major refocusing and strengthening of Nepal’s foreign policy and its diplomatic apparatus is long overdue in view of the momentous changes that have occurred in security, diplomatic and economic environments across the globe. Foreign policy paradigm shift is now a must for building an inclusive post-Jana Andolan-II and post-conflict Nepal with due international economic and diplomatic support.
Our foreign policy and diplomatic apparatus has been staggering in the absence of proper direction, unstable leadership , neglect and poor coordination. Economic diplomacy, post-conflict support, Bhutanese refugees; among others; have failed to receive focus. Adhocism and business as usual continues to be the rule. Lack of adequate institutional strengthening and appointment of ambassadors on patronage than competence continues to inflict damage. No consensus has been developed on foreign policy. Contentious border and water resources issues have been handled poorly. Donors and well-wishers are on “wait and see” mode on how to support emerging Nepal.
Foreign policy shift must balance continuity with changes to benefit from fast moving neighbors, India and China, and the world. Preserving national independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity; enhancing friendly and mutually beneficial relations with nation states and international organizations, and building good image will have to be the central objectives. In addition, attracting adequate resources to build sustainable, inclusive and prosperous post-conflict Nepal will be equally crucial.
With the collapse of bipolar superpower world and economics prevailing over political ideology Panchaseel and non-alignment have lost much of their brilliance. Indo-China relations have been warming. Nepal as a “Yam between two boulders” deserves continuity but with necessary fine- tuning based on the reality that the Yam and the boulders are drastically changing under the weight of endogenous and exogenous politico-economic developments. We must further consolidate our relations with other countries vital to our wellbeing in the changed context.
Nepal as a “Yam between two boulders” deserves continuity but with necessary fine- tuning based on the reality that the Yam and the boulders are drastically changing under the weight of endogenous and exogenous politico-economic developments. We must further consolidate our relations with other countries vital to our wellbeing in the changed context.
With globalization and free trade looming large in the horizon with tremendous potential for poverty reduction and development as well as significant uncertainties and risks, economic diplomacy must receive high priority. First, extract maximum benefits from WTO, SAARC, EU, US and dynamic economies of our neighbors, India and China; including being the true ‘transit point” between them. Second, attract significant foreign direct investments, particularly in water resources, tourism and infrastructure. Third, promote gainful foreign employment for ever-increasing labor force. Fourth, promote tourism and market for Nepali products, poverty reduction strategies, trade and commerce, carpets and garments. Fifth, mobilize appropriate and adequat e foreign technical and financial assistance, particularly grants. Also, draw support for post-conflict rebuilding, including relief, reconstruction and rehabilitation.
The foremost need is to build a national consensus on foreign policy. National security, water resources, river-linking, energy, border demarcation; including Kalapani and Susta; and regulating illegal activities at the international borders demand consensus and greater clarity in the new paradigm to be adopted. Proper review of implications of treaties and conventions signed in the past and development of proper framework as well as provision for adequate national debate for undertaking any treaties and agreements in the future must be assured. Policy for arranging more work for surplus security forces, including the Maoists to be accommodated in UN peace keeping and other security purposes should be built in the new initiatives. Consistent and clear positions must be initiated to deal with the Bhutanese refugee problem and the Tibetan refugees and intruders.
Terrorism, insurgency, migration, internally displaced and their implications to national and global security, stability and development are at the heart of serious contemporary concerns. We must develop well-defined policies and our diplomats must be informed of the policies on conflict resolution, peace building, cross border terrorism and proliferation of arms; particularly those concerning Nepal; as they have strong implications to our international image and support.
Means and mechanism for lobbying for important UN and International Agency positions; including the non-permanent UN Security Council seat; donor funding, investment, repatriation of Bhutanese refugees etc. are important for the missions based in UN and capitals of important nations. Millennium development goals, environment, indigenous populations, girl trafficking and gender are serious foreign policy matters. Rights based approaches are at the heart of contemporary developmental and diplomatic debates. Human rights standard is now important foreign policy issue to be addressed properly. Violations by the government and the Maoists have serious implications.
Many Ambassadorial positions are left vacant for extended periods and even key Ambassadorial appointments are based on patronage. Today’s Nepal has no dearth of well qualified people within and outside the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Clear criteria should be built in new policy for appointing ambassadors and honorary consuls. Provisions must be made to offer easy consular services and develop adequate contact with Nepali community by embassies. Effective training and orientation of newly appointed staff, ambassador and spouse s must be designed under new policy. Number and locations of embassies must be reviewed to ensure suitability and adequacy for the implementation of new vision.
Proper institutional strengthening and linkages will be critical for the successful implementation of the new foreign policy paradigm. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs ( MFA), the Institute of Foreign Affairs (IFA) and the Missions abroad will have to work closely for better policy focus, backstopping and feedback. IFA needs major professionalization. Missions abroad must be assessed for their potential and need. MFA is overstretched in terms of resources, competent manpower and think tank capacity. Hope the new Nepal Government does not fail to redirect foreign policy and strengthen institutions to enhance international relations to benefit our people from the changing world.
Dr. Pudasaini has served as the Representative of United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) in Sri Lanka and Yemen and Country Director for Maldives. He can be reached at [email protected]
(Editor’s Note: Nepalis, wherever they live, as well as friends of Nepal around the globe are requested to contribute their views/opinions/recollections etc. on issues concerning present day Nepal to the Guest Column of Nepalnews. Length of the article should not be more than 1,000 words and may be edited for the purpose of clarity and space. Relevant photos as well as photo of the author may also be sent along with the article. Please send your write-ups to [email protected] )