Recently the battle between indian tiktok community and youtube community is taking over the internet by a storm. A big indian youtuber named ‘Carry minati’ made a video that topped the likes and views charts in the indian youtube section very soon.

The video led to spread of homosexual hate in the indian community and later in his live stream he told people not to take it seriously but the number of people who watched the video was and the number of people who were watching the live stream had a huge gap however later the video was taken down and some people are claiming it was taken down due to mass reporters of tiktokers but the truth still remains hidden if it was actualy done by tiktokers or by the youtube itself.

As people were thinking it was due to tiktokers carry’s supporters began to report,uninstall and give bad reviews about tiktok in the play store and its rating has gone down to 1.3/5 for now and its assumed it will go down further however Carryminati again uploaded a video asking people to end this thing snd his fans don’t seem to take what he said and the bad reviews are still continuing.

He seemed emotional about his video being taken down and the views have reached upto 45 million for now. Moving to tiktokers recently faizal siddiqui’s tiktok account which had 13.5 million followers got permanently deleted because of a tiktok he threw acid on his ex (according to the visual script and yes it was fake) howerver it seemed that it would encourage youth to do such criminal activities and hence his account got deleted asap. is tiktok really a boon or a blessing? The controversy still exists.

Photo: FCC Chairman Ajit Pai drinks from a big coffee cup during a commission meeting December 14, 2017 in Washington, DC.

The Federal Communications Commission voted on Thursday to eliminate its power to ensure net neutrality, effectively paving the way for internet providers to begin charging companies and consumers for faster internet access.

These kinds of arrangements, commonly called “fast lanes,” will inevitably favor big companies and hurt innovation, net neutrality advocates have warned.

The FCC isn’t just making it so internet providers don’t have to follow the rules. The order voted on Thursday almost entirely removes the FCC from any responsibility when it comes to keeping an eye on how the internet runs. Instead, the Federal Trade Commission will be tasked with going after companies if they are deemed to have made deals that hurt consumers or competition — a move that few outside of anti-regulation advocates believe will be good for the internet.

Chairman Ajit Pai led the charge for the proposal, ignoring public outcry and even some Republicans in Congress who advocated for the FCC to keep the rules in place.

“If our rules deter the massive infrastructure investment that we need, eventually we’ll pay the price in terms of less innovation,” Pai said.

The vote marks a drastic reversal for net neutrality. Open internet advocates celebrated in 2015 when the FCC, then under Obama-appointee Chairman Tom Wheeler, voted to classify internet providers as “common carriers” — a legal term that allowed the regulator to keep a closer watch on internet providers in the same way utilities like electricity are regulated.

At the time, Pai, a Republican commissioner appointed by Obama, had voiced strong opposition to the move. Two years later, President Donald Trump appointed Pai as chairman. Pai then immediately signaled that he would move to reverse the 2015 vote.